Scroll down....

Please scroll down for lots of useful information. There are links to industry and environmental journals, relevant dates in the environmental and renewable energy calendar, current debates, a solar PV Feed-in Tariff calculator, green products websites, campaign groups and more. Some of this might be a bit outdated given time considerations and the fact that I don't get paid for doing this, but I do try and keep it as fresh and new as I can so it's still worth checking out.

Friday, 28 August 2015

The eight most stupid things about the UK solar cuts, according to Friends of the Earth

There’s not enough money to play with in the first place, because of George Osborne.   
Begin at the beginning. The Chancellor’s antipathy towards renewable energy is legend. Back in 2011 his Treasury muscled into DECC’s turf and imposed an arbitrary, immovable cap on spending on renewablesThat budget being apparently near its limit is the cause of everything that’s going on here – even though the actual budget is far bigger than FITs alone.  
It’s good to keep an eye on costs, of courseBut Mr Osborne’s playing hard-ball. He’s only letting DECC have £100 million to play with to fund all new installations between 2016 and March 2019. Laughable peanuts.  
(Tax breaks to North Sea oil and gas, by the way, were worth £1 billion in 2013-14 alone).  
A Martian would say: that’s a shame, eh. Can’t you give that a little bit more money, rather than chopping off its legs just as it’s getting going?  To which Mr Osborne would say, go away, Martian: I’ve got some fracking to force through.  

The new tariff rates are so low you may as well not bother  
We’d all gritted our teeth in expectation of 50% cuts to the FIT. What we actually got, for the kind of solar you might actually put on your roof, was closer to 90%. Aargh.  
As of right now, householders get 12.47p per unit (kWh) of energy they generate. That lets you pay back your panels in about, say, nine years. But what new folk will get from January 2016 is 1.63p.  Less than two pence per unit! That’s not a subsidy. It’s an insult.  Cuts to other scales of solar, and other technologies, are similarly wretched.  

The only people that’ll bother now will be hippies in Totnes   
DECC promises that “well-sited” solar panels will still attract investment. Oh yeah?  
Right then. What does “well-sited” mean? Get this: it means just the south-west of England. Sorry, Scotland! Bad luck, Manchester! Your fault for not being better-sited. Ha ha, eh?  
The tariffs have been set to “work” only for the very sunniest bits of the UK.  And they don’t work even there. By DECC’s own admission, rooftop solar won’t actually make you any profit even after 20 years, even if you do live in Penzance.  
So who’s going to bother? Only people that don’t care about financial return and just really, really like the planet (“motivated by sustainability” in DECC jargon). And/or who live on the English Riviera.  

Community energy needed this like a kick in the undercarriage  
Community energy is great. In Germany more than half of its zonking great renewable energy capacity is owned by individuals, families, towns, farms or other collectives of people bundling their money together.  
Just 18 months ago the UK Government promised a community energy “revolution” in the UK. So much for that.  
DECC admits the FIT cuts will mean curtains for most community energy schemes.  Just like with those households in Truro, the ones that do make it through will need to be motivated by an “altruistic, energy saving” objective – ie, it’ll lose money.  

The Government hasn’t worked out how many jobs it’ll cost  
DECC’s cuts will see the best part of one million (!) fewer renewable installations in the UK between now and 2020. 
Amazingly DECC haven’t done the sums on how many actual jobs this will cost, other than there being “likely to be a negative impact on existing jobs in the renewable electricity generation sector.”  Thanks for that.  Bit cavalier though eh, given the need for decent jobs in towns and cities across the UK.   
Oh, and not only has DECC not worked this out, but it hasn’t built into its economic calculations the huge loss of tax income and increase in dole payments to which this’ll lead. Which, given the thousands and thousands of jobs in the sector, could be massive. I’d wager it might even outweigh the measly cost of preserving a decent FIT (see #7).  

Yeah, not great news for climate change either  
These cuts mean less renewable energy, which means more energy from fossil fuels, which means more carbon emissions. About 1.6 million tonnes more, to be precise. Which is something like putting 300,000 cars back onto the roads for a year. Great.   

All to save £6 a year 
And what’s it all for – this destruction of an industry, the mass unemployment, the increased carbon emissions and the huge step back in clean energy?  
It’ll save you about £1 a year off your energy bill in 2016, rising to £6 a year by 2020.  
The Government hyperbole about ‘hard working consumers’ is completely out of whack with the reality of how much helping people install renewable energy actually costs. A more sensible and fair thing to do, if lopping a few quid off bills really is the government’s prime concern, would be to pay for the difference out of general Government spending instead.

And what if it’s all just a precursor to closing FITs entirely in a few months 
The Government says that if these new plans don’t work – if that paltry £100 million I talked about earlier is all used up – then it’ll just flat out end FITs from January 2016. Finished. Nada.  Zero pence.   

And hmm. That’s exactly what’s going to happen, isn’t it? People are going to rush to install solar in the coming weeks while it still makes vague financial sense to do so. It’s the rational thing to do. And so what’ll happen is that the money will run out. Which means: bye-bye, Feed-in Tariff.
Proposing measly new FITs means that inevitably, there’ll be a rush on. At which point DECC will take away their ball and go home, shutting FITs forever. 

Which would certainly keep Mr Osborne happy.  

Thursday, 27 August 2015

Renewable support cuts put thousands of jobs and local power at risk says RegenSW

Responding to the publication today of the government's Feed-in Tariff Review Merlin Hyman, chief executive of Regen SW [1] said: "Today's announcement puts at risk thousands of jobs and will undermine the opportunity for local people, businesses and communities to take control of the way we generate, use and supply energy”.

“Because of the Feed-in Tariff communities and businesses up and down the country have had the opportunity to harness their own natural energy resources, helping to reduce and localise energy spend, tackle fuel poverty and generate an income to re-invest in the local area. The government’s focus should be on supporting this ‘people power’ and reducing consumers' exposure to volatile fossil fuel prices – not simply cutting costs.”

We share the government's ambition to reduce and eliminate subsidies but these proposals put at risk the remarkable progress the renewable energy industry is making with deployment and cost reductions."

Alistair Macpherson, CEO of Plymouth Energy Community said: "Through two highly successful community share offers, we have raised nearly £1.5 million in community investment, resulting in 29 schools and community buildings benefiting from free solar PV, with more to come. These schemes generate a vital long-term community benefit fund to ensure longevity for PEC’s work reducing fuel poverty and carbon emissions in Plymouth. None of what we have achieved would have been possible without renewable energy support systems. In the future, solar will no doubt be free from direct support, but we need a stable pathway to get there."

Fred Barker from Bude Energy Community said: "Bude Community Power was formally established in April 2015 and has identified a potential portfolio of solar PV projects of at least 800 kW capacity. Recent and proposed government policy changes make it far less likely that we will be able to establish and develop our portfolio, due to the uncertainty relating to Feed-in Tariff levels. Our aim is to develop a better energy future, with more community benefits, lower energy bills and greater independence for the Bude area, but the changes are undermining our efforts’.

Gabriel Wondrausch, managing director of Sungift Solar, said: "these proposals will put back achieving subsidy free solar power by many years, this is bad for consumers and will put up the costs of meeting our renewable energy targets”. 
A review of the Feed-in Tariff Scheme, the Government’s subsidy scheme for generation of renewable electricity from small-scale installations.

UK government review of solar Feed-in Tariffs threatens possible closure of the scheme

Tuesday, 25 August 2015

US Energy chief says solar doesn't need subsidies to grow

The head of the US Energy Department says solar energy will continue to grow even without federal energy subsidies that begin phasing out at the end of next year.

Midsummer granted a loan for thin film manufacturing equipment

Solar energy company Midsummer, has received a loan of 10 million Swedish Krona (SEK) from the Swedish regional development agency to support its manufacturing of equipment for thin-film solar cells production.

Energy & Environment Dates 2012

Solar PV Feed-in Tariff Calculator


This calculator is provided by Solar Guide, an online resource of professional solar PV and solar thermal installation companies.

Just one percent of land is all that is needed for solar to meet UK electricity demand

The Renewable Energy Centre

TheRenewableEnergyCentre - saving money, saving energy and saving the planet.

Camden County (USA) wastewater solar project

Plains & Eastern Clean Line Project

AREVA Solar Salt Storage

EMEC wave test site Orkney

New Vestas low wind turbine

Los Alamos smart grid demonstration project

Renewable energy in Germany